Although they are similar legal terms, the California Penal Code clearly states the difference between robbery and theft.
If you have been charged with any of these crimes, the theft lawyers at Lluis Law know how to resolve these matters.
Call now and you will get a professional, no obligation consultation. We will answer all your questions related to the topic, as well as possible sanctions and available options for your case.
According to the California Penal Code, these types of crimes can be divided into two broad categories of criminal crimes. Theft-related violations and non-theft property violations.
Violations or damage to property not related to theft include:
- Vandalism – malicious destruction or damage to property (PC 594-a).
- Arson (PC 451).
- Property violation (trespass 602 CP).
Instead theft-related property crimes include:
- Robbery in California.
- Grand theft.
- Bicycle theft.
- Possession of theft tools (PC 466).
How are robbery and theft different?
Although they share certain characteristics, they are different categories of crimes. The basic difference between robbery and theft is motivation, the use of force and the way they are carried out:
- The person is directly stripped of one good by another individual.
- It involves the use of force or threats to seize the good.
- There is an invasion or trespassing on the victim’s property sometimes. Except when the robbery is carried out on the street.
- It is classified as a serious crime, therefore the penalties are higher and carry prison terms and fines.
For more information on this crime, please review our “Robbery in California” section.
- It does not require the presence of the owner of the property.
- You also do not need to invade the victim’s property (home, office, store, car).
- Violence or threats are not used.
- It is generally classified as a misdemeanor. Consequently, imprisonment can be replaced with probation or only a fine.
To learn all about this crime, check out our ” What is theft and petty theft” section.
Similarities between both crimes
- The property of others is taken without the consent or authorization of the owner.
- The property is taken and transferred to another place.
- There is an intention to keep the property taken permanently for your use and enjoyment.
The confusion in the use of one and the other term arises because in both there is a misappropriation.
Elements to establish the crime of robbery
To prove the crime of robbery in California, the prosecutor must clearly establish the following elements at trial:
- The defendant intentionally used force or intimidation to cause harm or fear to the victim.
- In California, the use of force (minimal violence) is essential to distinguish between one and the other crime.
- Even if there has been no use of a weapon, robbery can be carried out through intimidation.
- At the time of the fact, the victim feared that he/she would be physically assaulted by the accused if he/she did not agree to let himself be robbed.
If the victim is not aware that the crime was being committed, the prosecutor could not establish the robbery. However the prosecutor will be able to establish the crime as a theft since, although the victim did not see it, the dispossession of the property was consummated.
- The stolen property was taken in the presence of the victim and against his/her will. Although some decisions of the California courts have established jurisprudence in this regard.
Stolen property does not necessarily have to be with the person or body of the victim. It is enough that the personal property taken has been near the victim or within sight or hearing.
- That the accused attempted to escape by carrying the stolen property.
The best defense in Los Angeles, California
In the defense and representation of people accused of this type of crime, the case must be carefully studied. This is the only way to determine the best defense strategy to be used with the client.
Defenses in general for robbery or theft can be based on:
Inconsistencies in the accusation
It is sometimes possible to show that the prosecutor was wrong to classify as a robbery a crime that actually corresponded to theft.
An experienced theft and robbery attorney can argue that the prosecuting party failed to constitute the crime of robbery.
Some people are also wrongly accused of being confused with others. This frequently occurs in police line-ups, where the victim misidentifies the alleged offender.
Sometimes even the police can influence the victim’s judgment to identify an alleged assailant or thief. We know that people after having a traumatic experience like these are in shock.
This could affect your ability to identify the aggressor. Eyewitness-based allegations often also have inconsistencies.
Lack of evidence
Some cases presented in Los Angeles court are not even supported by sufficient evidence. There are no eyewitnesses, no confessions or compelling testimonies of the victims.
Those cases could be dismissed by the judge due to lack of evidence.
Suppression of evidence
Police actions in theft or robbery cases are sometimes unlawful. Confiscation of items stolen from the defendant’s home or car is done without a search warrant.
A motion by our attorneys can overturn a poorly constructed judicial process. The judge in these cases is requested to suppress the evidence because it was obtained illegally.
You already know the difference between theft and robbery. Whatever your case is, our Los Angeles criminal lawyers always have a solution at hand. As specialists with over 50 years of combined legal practice, we always offer our clients strong and effective defenses.
We are known as the best for our results. If it is not possible through negotiation, we will go to trial and fight yout case.